[cfgeeks] "ban" binary modules in 2008? W-T-Hhhh!

[Kevin Korb]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Getting rid of binary modules will be up to us users not the kernel
devs.  Allowing binary modules means more supoprted hardware to them.
Only us becoming non customers of the hardware manufacturers will get
rid of the binary modules.

- -- 
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
 	Kevin Korb			Phone:    (407) 252-6853
 	Systems Administrator		Internet:
 	FutureQuest, Inc.		Kevin at FutureQuest.net  (work)
 	Orlando, Florida		kmk at sanitarium.net (personal)
 	Web page:			http://www.sanitarium.net/
 	PGP public key available on web site.
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, syberghost wrote:

> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:00:00 -0500
> From: syberghost <syberghost at gmail.com>
> To: Central Florida Geeks <cfgeeks at mail.cfgeeks.org>
> Subject: Re: [cfgeeks] "ban" binary modules in 2008? W-T-Hhhh!
> 
> On 12/15/06, Kevin P. Inscoe <kevin at inscoe.org> wrote:
>>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/475654/focus=475721
>
> Then read down further, where Linus says it's bullcrap.
> _______________________________________________
> cfgeeks mailing list
> cfgeeks at mail.cfgeeks.org
> http://mail.cfgeeks.org/mailman/listinfo/cfgeeks
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-ecc01.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFgxwlVKC1jlbQAQcRAhlMAJ0UT+AK+Ty7DvSH1KlsXvedIQpsgwCeP/Ep
tDQi0YY6MXCDg1l7e/a3+Ik=
=0OaU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----