[cfgeeks] FCC eliminates morse code requirements
Albert Pratts
apratts at comcast.net
Sun Dec 17 15:07:56 EST 2006
Amen!
Steve Litt wrote:
> Yes.
>
> First, the government has to be involved, or the spectrum would be of no use
> to anyone. The government can, and indeed up until now *has* said for the
> privilige of using certain frequencies in certain ways, one must know Morse
> code. With the privilige comes responsibility.
>
> I'm aware the preceding is a slippery slope. Should we then say that in order
> to own a gun, one must take law enforcement classes so that, with EMP or 500%
> deflation, one can immediately function as a sheriff's deputy? Obviously not.
>
> But there's one difference. In the case of radio amateurs, the rule was
> already in place, and all they had to do to keep it implemented was to do
> nothing. In the case of guns, it requires a massive and intrusive change.
>
> So yes, in my opinion we should have mandated it, or more accurately,
> continued to mandate it.
>
> Another email discussed code as a way of keeping riffraff out. That's not my
> position. If it *were* used to keep rifraff out, it would be better used on
> mailing lists :-)
>
> ... - . ...- . -
> ____________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.cfgeeks.org/pipermail/cfgeeks/attachments/20061217/8a38d529/attachment.htm
More information about the cfgeeks
mailing list